- The Weekly Buzz 🐝 by Blossom
- Posts
- 🇨🇳 Nvidia Crashes 12% Amid Jensen's Affair: Should You Buy the Dip?
🇨🇳 Nvidia Crashes 12% Amid Jensen's Affair: Should You Buy the Dip?
What Jensen's affair with a Chinese spy means for the future of Nvidia...
TOP STORY
🇨🇳 Nvidia Crashes 12% Amid Jensen's Affair: Should You Buy the Dip?

☀️ Happy Sunday, everyone! After four straight red weeks, markets finally got a win. Across the indexes:
The S&P 500 rose +2.51%, its best week since early August
The Nasdaq rose +2.3%
The TSX rose +0.89%
😅 But while most of the market was bouncing back, one company was crashing amid perhaps one of the most insane corporate scandals of the decade…
😬 That company was of course, none other than Nvidia ($NVDA).
📉 But while most of the 1000s of hilarious memes this week (including the music video parody we made) focus on CEO Jensen Huang’s not-1, not-2, but 3 affairs (with 2 employees and an alleged Chinese spy), today we’ll focus on what all this means for the stock, and why there’s more to the story than a simple CEO affair.
😳 So What Actually Happened
🕵️ Here’s the timeline in case you missed it:
🗞️ Oct 29: The New York Times reports US intelligence believed an executive close to Jensen Huang was passing information to China
💔 ~Friday, Nov 6: After telling the board he'd been intimate with a business executive, Huang admits in a letter to all employees that he'd been unfaithful to his wife, taking "full responsibility"
🔍 Sunday, Nov 8: Nvidia's board opens an independent investigation, saying Huang may have been the "target of a foreign intelligence effort"
📰 Through the week: reports surface that there were three affairs, two with Nvidia employees and an alleged Chinese spy… while Bloomberg reports Huang had been denying the affair internally since late 2025
🚪 Thursday: Huang resigns as CEO, president, and board member, effective immediately, ending a 33-year run. CFO Colette Kress becomes interim CEO.
🇨🇳 The most significant of the 3 affairs was with Alice Huang (the alleged spy), who controls a Singapore cloud company called Megaspeed, which US investigators say moved roughly $7.5 billion of Nvidia chips into China through shell companies (the focus of today’s story).
📉 As a result of the scandal, the stock ended the week down 13%, 33% below last month's record high of $243.
🇨🇳 Why Do Investors Care So Much About An Affair?
👀 CEO affairs are nothing new, and it’s quite rare for a CEO to step down after one… so why was Nvidia different?
❌ Well, it comes down to China. The US bans Nvidia from selling its most advanced AI chips to China, so those chips can only get there through backdoors.
🔍 Bloomberg's analysis found Megaspeed's Nvidia imports topped $4.6 billion, with volumes surging right before global export curbs took effect… and if those chips really did flow through shell companies into Chinese hands, the question stops being about Huang's marriage and becomes whether Nvidia was helping China get around US export controls.

💬 As Scott Bessent, US Treasury Secretary, puts it:
"The story has been thus far on Jensen Huang's personal foibles. The real story here should be: Did Nvidia know their client, and was there a robust effort at Nvidia to make sure that there was no leakage and that they were selling to what were obviously pass-through shell companies?"
🔎 And the paper trail is eyebrow-raising to say the least… since US chip export bans hit, China's share of Nvidia's reported revenue fell from 12% to 6%… while Singapore's share doubled from 10.6% to 21.9%. Nvidia then stopped reporting sales by billing location altogether in October 2025:

🌼 Blossom Buys The Dip
💪 While Wall Street debated what Nvidia is worth without Jensen, the Blossom community made up its mind fast, with a record $23 million of $NVDA traded on the day Jensen resigned (13x an average 2026 day) with 86% of investors net buying.

🛒 Across the full week, dollars bought outweighed dollars sold by more than 2-to-1 ($48 million vs. $22 million).
🤔 But was all this dip buying the right call? Let’s look at the arguments for and against buying the Nvidia dip… but first, a quick word from our sponsor this week: BMO ETFs!
🎙️ Did you know Blossom has a podcast? If you want to hear what BDInvesting, The Humbled Trader, and Canadian in a T-Shirt have to say about the Jensen scandal, tune in here!
SPONSORED BY BMO ETFs
💸 Monthly cash flow from stocks you know. Canada's first single-stock autocallable ETFs*

📊 BMO ETFs bring investors the next generation of cash flow solutions with Canada’s first single stock autocallable ETFs.*
🌟 Explore more ways to generate cash flow
BMO Autocallable ETFs offer Canadian investors another way to seek attractive monthly cash flow potential than traditional fixed income, along with limited downside protection at maturity when predefined conditions are met.
Designed to provide return characteristics similar to those of an autocallable structured note3 , these ETFs make autocallable investing more accessible with the flexibility to buy or sell units throughout the trading day.
✅ Discover which BMO Autocallable ETFs are right for you
Choose targeted exposure to a company you follow or diversify across an actively managed portfolio of U.S. large-cap opportunities.
Management Fee: 0.40%
Risk rating: Medium to High1
One company per ETF: NVIDIA, Palantir or Tesla
Defined term: each ETF ends if called early, or at maturity**
🌐 Diversified: BMO Strategic Autocallable Income US Large Cap ETF (ZACU)
Management Fee: 0.65%
Risk rating: Medium1
Actively managed portfolio of multiple autocallable transactions
Linked to many U.S. large-cap companies
Evergreen: the manager monitors and reinvests after terminations and autocalls
*See the BMO Global Asset Management disclaimer at the end of the newsletter
TOP STORY CONT.
⚖️ So… Is Nvidia Still a Buy Without Jensen?

🤔 Before you join the Blossom dip-buyers, it's worth hearing both sides… because the scandal creates real problems for the company beyond just Jensen’s naughty deeds.
🔑 1) Nobody knows who runs Nvidia next
🏗️ Nvidia had no succession plan, with around 60 senior leaders reporting straight to Huang… so his exit leaves a big leadership void.
📣 Baird analyst Tristan Gerra predicts a permanent CEO might not be picked until as far away as 2027 and expects an outsider… while other reports say the search is already down to three or fewer names, all big external ones, with top Apple executives being contacted.
🗺️ But Jensen will be hard to replace, with Jensen personally driving the product roadmap, and as Yahoo Finance's Sozzi put it, "it's hard to envision where the company will be 18 to 24 months from now without him".
🇨🇳 2) ‘China’ revenues could evaporate
🚨 Nvidia's own forecast already assumes zero data centre revenue from China… but if a meaningful chunk of Singapore's 21.9% of revenue is really disguised China demand (as the Megaspeed case suggests), then "China exposure" isn't the official 6% that's already written off… it could be closer to a fifth of Nvidia's revenue that tighter enforcement could claw away.
🏛️ And enforcement is coming, with Congress already calling hearings, with Huang, Nvidia's general counsel Tim Teter, and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick all expected to testify over the next month about both Huang's conduct and potential export-control violations.
💰 3) The $132 billion overhang
🤑 Huang walks away still owning about 3.6% of Nvidia, a stake worth roughly $132 billion… and now the clock on when (and whether) he sells becomes its own market story.
💍 $11 billion of that sits in his own name, the other ~$121 billion sits in family trusts, including one he runs with his wife, Lori… so his marriage is now a weirdly real factor in what happens to those shares.
🗓️ Legally, he can sell today, but for three months after leaving, he still counts as an insider (meaning any big sale needs a public SEC filing) but this ends in February just before Nvidia's annual report.
😮💨 To be fair, his entire stake equals less than six days of Nvidia's typical trading volume, and the company has $235 billion of buyback capacity left… enough to absorb every share he owns.
💪 The Case That Nothing Has Changed
🗣️ The dip-buyers argument was best summed up by Wedbush's Matthew Bryson:
"Nothing has changed. AI demand is still strong and Nvidia is still selling every chip it can make.”
📝 Morgan Stanley's Joseph Moore agrees, saying his firm's view of a "strong, durable AI buildout" is unchanged… while noting near-term uncertainty will persist since Huang was "crucial to the company's strategic direction."
🧠 Nvidia's sales are effectively locked in for this quarter and next (the chips were ordered long ago), so at least in the near term we shouldn’t see much impact on Nvidia’s bottom line.
💰 And with the recent price drop, Nvidia is now trading at roughly 11-13x next year's expected earnings (vs. about 18x for the S&P 500)… for a company whose revenue grew 106% last quarter, with Q3 guidance at $108 billion… this is looking objectively ‘cheap’.
🎯 Analysts overall have Nvidia rated as a ‘moderate buy’ with a $248 price target, 52% above the current price.
🧭 So, Should You Buy?
🤷♂️ In my opinion, it’s a toss-up. The price-earnings ratio is looking incredibly low, and the market often overreacts to bad news, so I would usually lean toward buying in situations like this.
⚠️ But the biggest risk to me is from the ~20% of revenue coming from Singapore, and whether that is real revenue or chips bypassing US export controls… so it’s not as simple as a regular affair.
🗓️ Luckily, we won’t have to wait long for new info: Nvidia reports Q3 earnings Tuesday, with analysts expecting revenue to jump about 91% to $108.7 billion… excited to keep hearing everyone’s thoughts on Blossom.
💡 But one thing is for sure - this week was a masterclass for investors on the value of diversification. While the market was soaring, one man’s cheating scandal brought one of the most popular stocks to its knees.

🧩 And here’s the uncomfortable part: no amount of research would have protected you. You can model data centre demand and read every earnings call, but you can’t model your CEO’s personal life… and that’s exactly the kind of risk diversification exists for.
📊 The heatmap above makes the point best, the money that fled Nvidia didn’t even leave the AI trade… it just moved next door, with AMD +18.9%, Broadcom +18.2%, and Micron +12.8% this week. So someone holding the chip sector had one of their best weeks of the year, someone holding the whole market had its best week since August… and only the investor holding Nvidia alone was down -13%.
🔍 So use this week as a reminder to check how much of your portfolio is riding on any single ticker (you can do this on Blossom PRO with our portfolio overlap feature, which adds your direct exposure to how much you hold in ETFs):
😎 All right - before we wrap up, 3 quick stories: the two biggest neoclouds reported earnings, and an AI giant just set the date for the second-biggest IPO ever… right after a quick word from our other sponsor!
SPONSORED BY HARVEST ETFs
💸 HLIF | Income from Canada’s Dividend Leaders

📈 Canada’s market has delivered a strong performance dating back to January 2025. Indeed, the S&P/TSX Composite Index is up 47% since January 2025 as of close on November 10, 2026, compared to the S&P 500, which is up 27% over the same period1 .
🍁 The Harvest Canadian Dividend Leaders Income ETF (TSX: HLIF)2 lets investors tap into the dominant players in Canada’s economy. These companies have wide moats, boasting oligopolistic characteristics with substantial market shares, strong financial reserves, and decades of dividend payouts.
💵 Moreover, HLIF is designed to generate monthly cash distributions through an active covered call writing strategy.
✅ Why HLIF?
30 large-cap Canadian companies with long dividend-growth histories
Equally weighted to reduce single stock risk
Attractive monthly income with opportunity for capital appreciation
Covered call strategy to enhance portfolio income potential and lower volatility
🌟 Harvest ETFs: Invest in Canada’s Strengths.
*See the Harvest ETFs disclaimer at the end of the newsletter
IN OTHER NEWS
🗞️ Other Big Headlines

☁️ CoreWeave Jumps 25% on a Massive Backlog and Raised Guidance
🔙 Now, continuing from last week (read here) where we mentioned both CoreWeave and Nebius would report earnings… well, here it is:
🟢 First, CoreWeave (CRWV) reported on Wednesday, showing revenue of $3.66 billion vs. $3.55 billion expected, up 168% year-over-year, compared with a loss of -$1.27 per share vs. -$1.16 expected, while also raising full-year revenue guidance to $13.0-13.3 billion, helping the stock jump almost 25% on Wednesday
📝 While the company’s quarterly net losses widened to $709 million, up from $110 million a year ago, its backlog jumped to $132.5 billion from $104 billion a quarter ago.
🔮 CoreWeave CEO Michael Intrator said, “Demand for the infrastructure is and remains overwhelming,” noting that the comapny is about 10x oversubscribed on its remaining 2027 capacity. Shares remain down about 33% year-to-date.
⏳ Nebius Falls 16% as Delays Overshadow a Beat
🚀 A day later on Thursday, Nebius ($NBIS) reported, showing revenue of $980.8 million vs. $907.5 million expected, up 571% year-over-year, with losses per share of -$0.31 vs. -$0.69 expected.
🔭 Management currently expects 2027 revenue to be about $12-13 billion on $40 billion to $45 billion of CapEx, though shares still sank about 16% after pushing back its target of $7 billion in annualized revenue from December to February and lifting 2026 CapEx to about $27 billion.
🗣️ Management’s defence was that the changes to 2026 guidance are about timing, not demand. But for a company that has its 2026 CapEx at roughly 9 times revenue (at the low end of their own CapEx guidance), any minor change hits investors the wrong way.
⚠️ In all fairness though, Nebius’ drop wasn’t only due to earnings, with Bloomberg reporting just a week prior stating that Microsoft ($MSFT) was tightening oversight of neocloud projects (Microsoft’s contract with Nebius is worth up to about $17 billion).
🤖 Anthropic Sets IPO Price Range, With IPO As Early As Next Week
💰 Lastly, Anthropic updated its S-1 this week, setting a range of $70-$78 per share for its upcoming 825 million shares on the Nasdaq (ticker $ANT; see Blossom’s stock page here), coming to a potential raise of about $64.4 billion, which would make it the second biggest IPO in history, after SpaceX ($SPCX).
📊 This raise also values it at roughly $1 trillion on basic shares and up to $1.4 trillion fully diluted, above its $965 billion funding round in May but below the $1.5 trillion to $2 trillion we flagged when it first filed.
🗓️ Pricing is expected Wednesday, Nov 18, with the first trade on Thursday, Nov 19 (next week)!
BMO Global Asset Management Disclaimer
**Subject to earlier termination if an Autocall Event occurs. Investors own units of the ETF, not the Reference Shares, and receive equity-linked exposure through the ETF's transactions. Distributions, if any, are expected monthly, may vary and are not guaranteed. Investors can lose money.
1 All investments involve risk. The value of an ETF can go down as well as up and you could lose money. The risk of an ETF is rated based on the volatility of the ETF’s returns using the standardized risk classification methodology mandated by the Canadian Securities Administrators. Historical volatility doesn’t tell you how volatile an ETF will be in the future. An ETF with a risk rating of “low” can still lose money. For more information about the risk rating and specific risks that can affect an ETF’s returns, see the BMO ETFs’ prospectus.
2 Distribution: An amount paid by the ETF to unitholders. Cash distributions, if any, are expected monthly, may vary and are not guaranteed. Monthly cash flow is conditional: if the Closing Price of the Reference Shares is below the Coupon Threshold on a Coupon Observation Date, the Manager expects that no distribution will be made on the next monthly distribution date. Distributions may differ from Coupon Payments and may include returns of capital.
3 Autocallable structured note: a debt investment linked to the performance of a reference asset, such as a stock. It may pay conditional coupons and mature early based on the reference asset’s performance on the scheduled observation date. At maturity, a reference asset below the protection threshold may incur in a loss.
BMO Global Asset Management Disclaimer
The information contained herein is not, and should not be construed as investment, tax or legal advice to any party. Particular investments and/or trading strategies should be evaluated relative to the individual’s investment objectives and professional advice should be obtained with respect to any circumstance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
As an alternative mutual fund, BMO Strategic Autocallable Income US Large Cap ETF (the “Alternative BMO ETF”) has the ability to invest in asset classes and use investment strategies that are not permitted for conventional mutual funds, including the ability to invest in other alternative mutual funds and to employ leverage and borrow cash to use for investment purposes. While these strategies will be used in accordance with the Alternative BMO ETF’s investment objectives and strategies, under certain market conditions they may accelerate the pace at which an investor’s investment decreases in value. The Alternative BMO ETF is subject to restrictions and practices contained in Canadian securities legislation applicable to alternative mutual funds, including NI 81-102, and is managed in accordance with these restrictions, except as otherwise permitted by exemptions provided by Canadian securities regulatory authorities.
BMO Autocallable Income NVIDIA (NVDA) ETF –Series 1, BMO Autocallable Income Palantir (PLTR) ETF –Series 1 and BMO Autocallable Income Tesla (TSLA) ETF –Series 1 (each, a “BMO Single-Stock ETF” and collectively, the “BMO Single-Stock ETFs”).
Investments in the BMO Single-Stock ETFs are uncertain in nature in that they could produce no positive return, and an investor could lose some or all of its principal investment. An investment in the BMO Single-Stock ETFs is only suitable for investors who are prepared to assume the risk of an investment whose return and repayment of the initial invested amount is
dependent upon the level of the Closing Price of the applicable Reference Shares on the applicable Coupon Observation Dates, Autocall Observation Dates and Maturity Date. The BMO Single-Stock ETFs are not a suitable investment for investors that require a guaranteed return, cannot withstand a loss of some or all of their principal investment, or do not understand
their terms or the risks involved.
The units of the BMO Single-Stock ETFs are not fixed income securities or linked notes and are not designed to be alternatives to fixed income or money market instruments. The BMO Single-Stock ETFs invest in Autocallable Transactions, which are derivatives that expose investors to downside risk. Investors who do not understand the BMO ETFs, or do not intend to monitor their
investments, should not buy the BMO Single-Stock ETFs.
Any statement that necessarily depends on future events may be a forward-looking statement. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Although such statements are based on assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from expectations. Investors are cautioned not to rely unduly on any forward-looking statements. In connection with any forward-looking statements, investors should carefully consider the areas of risk described in the most recent prospectus.
Commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investments in exchange-traded funds. Please read the ETF Facts or prospectus of the BMO ETFs before investing. Exchange-traded funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated.
For a summary of the risks of an investment in the BMO ETFs, please see the specific risks set out in the ETF facts or prospectus. BMO ETFs trade like stocks, fluctuate in market value and may trade at a discount to their net asset value, which may increase the risk of loss. Distributions are not guaranteed and are subject to change and/or elimination.
BMO ETFs are managed by BMO Asset Management Inc., an investment fund manager, a portfolio manager, and a separate legal entity from Bank of Montreal.
“BMO (M-bar roundel symbol)” is a registered trademark of Bank of Montreal, used under licence.
Harvest ETFs Disclaimer
1 Price returns (excluding dividends) calculated from closing levels of the S&P/TSX Composite Index (CAD) and the S&P 500 (USD), Dec. 31, 2024 to Nov. 10, 2026. Index data: Yahoo Finance (^GSPTSE, ^GSPC), accessed Nov. 11, 2026
2 Formerly Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF
For Information Purposes Only. All comments, opinions and views expressed are of a general nature and should not be considered as advice and/or a recommendation to purchase or sell the mentioned securities or used to engage in personal investment strategies.
Commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investing in Harvest Exchange Traded Funds managed by Harvest Portfolios Group Inc. (the “Funds”). Please read the relevant prospectus before investing. The Funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated.




